Everyone argues about cheat settings and almost nobody tests them. So we handed the job to ChatGPT: give it the full feature list of our Inferno R6 cheat, ask it to build a config, then take whatever it produces into ranked. Three configs, three attempts, no editing its homework. It turns out a language model has a decent grasp of aimbot theory and no idea at all what a cheat menu should look like.
The setup
The method was simple. Paste Inferno's feature list into ChatGPT, ask for a complete config with values for every setting, apply it exactly as written, and play ranked. If a config got us killed or got us called out, that was the config's fault, not ours. Three rounds of this, keeping score.
Config one: good aim, terrible eyes
The first attempt got the aimbot genuinely right. It set smoothing to 12, which is close to what we actually run for legit play, and the rest of the aim settings were sensible enough to take straight into a match. That is a better first guess than most people manage on their own, and it is the interesting part of the whole experiment: the aim theory is well understood and clearly well represented in whatever the model learned from.
The ESP was the opposite. Ugly, badly coloured, hard to read at a glance. Not dangerous, just unpleasant, and it makes sense once you think about it. Aimbot values are numbers with reasoning attached, the kind of thing people write about. Visual configuration is taste, and taste does not survive being described in text. Five out of ten overall, carried entirely by the aim settings.
Config two: better visuals, dangerous aim
Round two flipped it. The ESP was noticeably better, still not great but readable. The aimbot was the problem, and it was obvious before the first fight that it would be blatant the moment we shot at anyone. It was, and there was a round in there where we had to consciously calm down and stop taking fights because the aim was doing far too much of the work.
We won the game, and config two took the lead on visuals alone, which tells you how low the bar was. The useful lesson is one we make in every guide: a config that looks impressive in the menu can still be the thing that ends your account, and you can usually tell within one gunfight.
Config three: the one that actually worked
The third attempt was the best of the three by a clear margin. Better visuals than the first two and aim settings with enough smoothing to look human, which is exactly the balance you want and exactly what the first two each got half right. Ranked went well with it, and it was genuinely usable rather than a novelty.
What this actually tells you
- Smoothing around 12 is a real starting point. The model landed near it independently, and it matches what we run. If you are guessing, start there and adjust by feel rather than copying a number from a forum post.
- Aim settings are the learnable part; visuals are personal. Nobody can hand you an ESP config that suits your eyes, your monitor and the maps you play. Expect to spend a few minutes on it yourself.
- A menu is not a config. Two of the three attempts were fine on paper and only revealed themselves in a real gunfight. That is the test that matters.
- Do not outsource your risk tolerance. A model asked for a good config will happily hand you settings that get you reported, because it has no stake in your account. You do.
If you want the settings we would actually recommend rather than the ones a chatbot invents, they are in our R6 guide, and the reasoning behind them applies to every game in the three pillars.
The cheat used
Inferno is what all three configs were built for: aimbot and wallhack, simple to set up and the entry price of our R6 lineup, which makes it a reasonable place to learn what each setting actually does. If you want more to configure, Frost adds chams and finer aim control and Frost Pro goes further again. All of them are on the Rainbow Six Siege cheats page, with live detection status on the Inferno status page.
Frequently asked questions
Can ChatGPT actually build a working cheat config?
It can produce workable aimbot values, and in our test one of three configs was genuinely good. The visual side was weak every time. Treat it as a starting point to adjust, not an answer.
What smoothing should I run in R6?
Around 12 is a sensible baseline for legit play. Lower it only if your raw aim is poor, and understand that you are trading believability for speed when you do.
Is Inferno good for learning settings?
Yes. It is the cheapest of our R6 cheats and straightforward enough that you can see what each option changes without a hundred toggles in the way.
Prefer to watch: all three configs tested in ranked are on our YouTube channel.
